Mayne: "The Female Audience and the Feminist Critic"


Summary by: Maricarmen Martinez
 

            Mayne argues that there are two methodologies to analyze classical film from a feminist perspective.  These are the "images of women" and the "reading against the grain." The methodology of "images of women" usually points for the negative and distorted representation of women in the screen, and with the lack of correspondence between those representations and the real world. The "reading against the grain approach" to the analysis of classical cinema sees the images of women not so much as distorted, but as parts or components of a system. This approach concentrates on the contradictions inherent in the film as it is a representational commentary of the world. This approach implies deconstructing the film and seeing what  gets resolved  and how does it resolved, or what the film leaves either in tension or intact.
                   These two methodologies of the feminist  film criticism can be understood chronologically. In the early stages, feminism and feminist theory were interested in the absence  of women from the public sphere and, from the also, public screen. For these feminists absence meant displacement or repression and NOT necessary failure to appear.  There have always been women in the images of film, but their role has been traditionally, passive.  The "images of women" approach suggests that the eye behind the camera is male and that the world of filmical representation, like our world is looked at from a male point of view that is to say. Patriarchy is for this approach, a system of social control.  For this type of analysis there are privileged lookers and the objects of their gaze (females).  For the "reading against the grain" method, patriarchy is not so monolithic as to only  produce  distortedimages of women only serve its hegemonic purposes. Hence, the difference between the two methods of analysis is ideological. The "images of women " method sees patriarchy as a system of control, the "reading against the grain " method sees patriarchy as a system full of contradictions, gaps and slips of the tongue. (189)
           The two methods of film analyisis reflects the trajectory of feminist literary criticism and of the feminist movement in general.  These are the moments of the development of feminist criticism; 1.  naive but conciliatory assertion of sisterhood as encoded in the slogan "sisterhood is powerful";  2. patriarchy as the enemy of women;  3.  power of femininity within the mythology of men; 4. contradictions in patriarchy towards the role of women.
                           Mayne argues that because there are so very few women film makers the "reading against the grain" method becomes important since it is necessary to demystify classical cinema and because this method sees in  the contradictory positions towards women that film embodies, the cracks of the patriarchal system.  By deconstructing, say, the sexual politics of classical cinema, the feminist critique can see the weak bases of such a politics. she can do this by asking qustions of this sort;  Is the narrative traditional? Does it ending have the traditional solution of boy gets girl? Are there subplots that reveal the ambiguity of the film towards its own traditional narrative? T
     The "reading against the grain" method has also to account for the preference of the female spectators.  Why do women go to see movies made by an industry  that represents them on the screen as absence? Apparently, female viewers are "the ultimate dialecticians." Like a person in exile, she lives the tension of two different cultures. The language of the screen is coded for the invisibility of the female, yet she watches it and brings into  the viewing an her interpretation of the film her particular female codes. How are women spectators dealing with the images they see on films?'. Do women, as spectators, experience and hlod  the same ambiguities as those present in films they watch? These avenues of analysis have not been, for Mayne, fully explored and therefore she proposes an analysis of female spectator hip which deal with the ambiguity of the films and the ambiguity if the female viewer.
 
                                                                    

         Back To Maricarmen's Cultural Studies Page
 
 

 

If you have comments or suggestions, email me at maricarmen@resourceful.com